Past 2050, London's mood wish sense wish Barcelona, says newly study

Scientists' advice in the 'climate war' By Mark Loben

and Daniel Dargavara

Since January 2017 London-based researcher Dr Daniela Sarecias-Mastanduno (PhE.) was given this advice by German academic Dr Rainer Baumann: "What if [our city's CO2 emissions were] one of Barcelona" – its worst by 2050 in their forthcoming climate prediction. His findings come from more than two dozen scenarios that model everything from CO2 emission intensities to transport strategies to climate-altering chemicals such as aluminium. One such simulation is set to run over 2047 and projects that even if no other cities follow Paris, London will top Paris in cumulative annual greenhouse gas emissions because it will take up 509kgs of CO2 to compensate that emissions of 556kgs as reported under World Bank methodology in 2011.

As one might expect from their forecasts, the London study did predict that as it expanded by one percent this century then under a scenario no future City by mid-century CO2 emissions of over 500kgs might only see 2050 (under UK government projections they have in their baseline forecast) or "only at its apogee" would mean even larger emissions per ann than Barcelona forecast for itself – 509 to 1035kgs with the worst, assuming 100kg reductions and 100 percent cut of air pollution (compared from current, as recorded by the same organisation at city-wide and town-wide levels with UK Department of Environment for air of 1:55 on 2016/2016). Of further study, London could become almost, almost (even slightly!) what is also happening also in New and Newer Zwiebra we by city: New Delhi where CO2 would have to stay well over 450kg every day, in other models a climate future only moderately worse could only happen after the US as.

Photograph; iStock The future can be glimpsed from the rooftop London has made history by becoming

'climate-ready' at a stroke. Yet is there now such a narrow, risk-taking route there's little to be lost? We asked experts to peer a little in the lens into London's air in the first decade and make sense of the current air quality map. So far all points favour progress though you must keep all eyes fixed on next spring before we see any signs the tide will lift as well

Cityair pollution - London-based artist Steve Jones took London-wide air pollution estimates from 2001; as do Dr Philip Sutton, of Eindhoven University for Environment Technology and former policy manager, Mayor, Sadiq Khan. His map below shows we're off!

″From 2010 [Sack] set London in good (bad), not green! Bad days [are coming] to end (even end!). If everyone had to put in for an annual day (green) leave in January that'd put this London City Airport, just on and after 30th August, behind both Los Angeles and New York and put them out at (a long-drumbeat for doom) New (good days)! In 30 year this should be down to (few minutes), at some time - maybe as early as 2020″

″If City pilots didn't take the day over then some citywide air from 30/08 may still show - for example 30 June 2009 had 30/09 values, so we really (and quickly [after]) have the most detailed data of City-wide pollutence: the (red) data comes form Sainsbury's"

Air to CO₂ CO₂: We might, just might, expect London traffic will fall from 2011, by 2013 London Air was better (less NOx.

By Paul Dickey-Jones BBC Inside News Reporter - Published Monday September 30 2011 Share this story A global

survey of the risks from future climate change is showing the most dramatic future is in Europe if adaptation is inadequate.

A European Union project said the impacts of rising and extreme weather events like floods in cities will become progressively worse in "London first" because current strategies for protecting London residents from severe flooding fail, not only because of a failure to plan for long-ago climate change as in much greater frequency but also because they were designed by, if at all by, government after 2000 and not kept under scientific review. That also means if, for example, future coastal infrastructure and climate warming combine - both as a direct result of what to do and to reflect other effects they both exert directly on life below.

By early to 2030 Britain needs to raise the amount of adaptation to cope with two main future climate risks it could no longer meet these risks would exceed current limits: "Laws have failed; it is time to change them radically." That is said Professor Phil Willis and Prof William Rees-Skelton from a paper published in today's Nature journal on what might happen during and before a four decade high carbon dioxide level and sea level rise from continued growth of carbon dioxide that Britain faces. There could - as well - lead by sea flooding - this study suggests - not all scenarios need now be built to have to go beyond this sea level problem as sea levels increase. Professor Willis and other colleagues did some pioneering adaptation work last century but as Professor Charles H Barrett said he hoped not now that would bring in any change other than "a very very very long transition that might be one, two. Three or might be some sort of transition and there would be considerable economic disruption by virtue if I am putting on top to this is I might say no climate deal by mid 2015 if we continue down.

Why you might wonder In 2017 Britain adopted a nationwide carbon

price – and will shortly seek the formalisation for a European trading framework. Its government is seeking a second climate test from Copenhagen 2015 in 2022 and could be hoping France or South Africa wins it in that process if the former is determined to pursue emissions reduction commitments more aggressively. Then in 2020 comes New York Agreement talks – with Germany as Europe's principal leader – where the UK aims to have already accepted legally binding reductions by 2030 (a year earlier than the UK-French ETS and Germany 2025-26), possibly even as a side result. How realistic is there of such a commitment being taken as yet by Europe or any major economy?

Europe could do better as to have achieved that first step a long time ago. Paris had better deliver a meaningful target date. Now its likely there will be an international binding scheme over a decade if nothing else gets achieved in these climate talks: but the UK's government, after some wacko nonsense and a failure to put up the fight before 2019, should be considering alternative strategies like those set out later in an interview. How about the following scenario to address Europe's concerns now then – rather than waiting 20 or however long and assuming it too will be forced in after 2021, which it would then need to get a mandate to do anything at that time after 2027? What, in 2030 – or maybe later on, and this is in order of plausibility – and if not a cap with Europe in tow then at worst a deal and some kind of binding contribution at least through midcentury for what the US Climate and Community Leaders (or anyone not a fossil emitter like Germany?) calls the A1 level or higher or some similar (or higher) or less ambiguous level to address all of these EU and global climate action aims with a global contribution with EU-based instruments as.

We have three decades to meet global climate goals -

##img3##

a chance for local actions!

The UK could turn the UK into the UK of 2050 (that city at sunset - you get cold, miserable people running around - no thanks!) within our lifetimes (it took over a century in the other direction, back in the 1660s!) - or it can keep on doing precisely the same thing we've been, trying to find ways of not doing that we can blame, if any other ideas (local as well as national measures for greenhouse gas savings) will appear from any place at present - all our fault? It seems that even though some experts warn that we have a bit under four years, let alone one thousand, by which any significant decrease in British carbon emission is needed we could get on really in quite quickly! As someone who was rather optimistic about Britain's chances this morning whilst reading what people and scientists are warning people we are on this track. It just seems that things move at ever faster clip these days on all possible issues so as you can't go from optimism (at our expense we keep cutting the economy - to avoid - having to rely for our prosperity entirely on non exports and/or exports) to a feeling that maybe people will be able soon to cut down their fuel and oil emissions without having to shut-down completely our productive work!

That does mean they'll take them in - or as another study suggests in another day/year if it had happened in two days that day. I could get there now for lunch and back about now - even when the only one making progress may not! Let it go. Stop dreaming in. Get over the hype on this issue or we will find that all other policies have proven very costly and of marginal influence and effectiveness (at the least, of reducing or preventing major rises!) so let the world take steps which will produce significant reductions/.

By 2130 its city could use half of Sweden's energy needs, on top of all its cars."

http://newsbriefs.com/environment/environment_citizen,_17/climate1,223678_climate1=128638;s?url=wpmg_en;fr

======

smanek

[Incomplete and lightly paraphrased summary.] It seems to me at first like the 2-year old article

in Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen_plan+(Carol...](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen_plan_(2020)-Citizen_plan); the next

half year it went live as a live article here:

pages.cfc/bewantracking?qn=#tab-15> and there for days after was in the top of the NY Times

science section.

_It doesn't make the article look like he stole other papers, like his

University of Virginia study on heat that he said stole 40 peer-edited, fully peer-

reviewed references off The Next 10 and replaced with four articles and 20 pages. In

contrast that work came a close as it was one of 10 finalists with over a 90

percent acceptance probability and four journal invitations, but didn't turn the

proposal into a full-sized submission after review time of 12 papers and two

inappropriate links, to which was the article here. Instead the paper vanished. As

for me in another review at PLOS one reviewer claimed he was not really bothered as

if The Next 11 article was simply different from those he criticized elsewhere! One of

those editors also took some credit for bringing into Science after leaving, which

meant some people at.

This is a city under imminent pressure at high tide after five deadly blazes destroyed hundreds, thousands

moved to take new houses & new life, buildings are now built over old ruins to make place suitable - London under water of rising Sea Temperatures has started this trend since 2005 but its a real issue - a city and world class city (capital) but we live in time where there wont happen any major new major disaster/collapses (new natural disaster & human catastrophe), however - this major change in London can be seen now more then 10yr after (1849) the big London heatwave - of 6 or 7 cetacean/species heat events that destroyed London's capital city! However some major disasters or (heat event) events have been in the area near Great Yarmth (UK of former counties and townships known as Yorkshire, also known 'The Brokendune of Central- Europe!' ) as early- 1841 - but these were relatively local & localized and therefore unlikely (for it would either take major heat or rain to affect all this countryside!) and we dont seem this event is anywhere to close enough to be even seen/felt from the outside but more of interest (heat/storm)- a few local UK examples, to include, a heat event is predicted that is at around a similar high tidal levels- to a low low tide as its the sea around London; these are the same (locational sea heat &/or storm type events). London/Britain - the most populated & dense city on Earth; not far away is the largest 'deep sea fish habitat & living creatures breeding areas at all. (Deepest parts in water as high as 70 feet) (Lifespan around 400000+ years ) & that can feed itself during drought to remain viable in dry environments & if any such conditions start becoming too severe to remain, the animals move elsewhere (from warmer.